John “Walnuts” McCain wants to be our next president based largely on his claim of being the right man to handle the Iraq war. Never mind that doesn’t know the difference between Sunni and Shiite Muslims. Forget his recent reference to the nonexistent Iraq-Pakistan border. (The “Iraq-Pakistan border”, if you want to call it that, is a whole country known as Iran.) He’s the right guy. He’s a foreign policy expert. Just ask him.
And with major “news organizations” like CBS committing outright fraud to back him up, how can McCain fail to get the message across? The Keith Olbermann video of the fraud is available here.
Katie Couric was questioning McCain about “the surge” and Barack Obama’s views thereon. Couric asked:
Senator McCain, Senator Obama says, while the increased number of US troops contributed to increased security in Iraq, he also credits the Sunni awakening and the Shiite government going after militias. And says that there might have been improved security even without the surge. What’s your response to that?
I don’t know how you respond to something that is as — such a false depiction of what actually happened. Colonel McFarlane [phonetic] was contacted by one of the major Sunni sheiks. Because of the surge we were able to go out and protect that sheik and others. And it began the Anbar awakening.
Absolutely wrong. The so-called Anbar Awakening began in the summer of 2006, long before the infamous “surge.”
But McCain’s spectacular ignorance is no impediment when you have friends like CBS. Here’s the answer they showed their viewers:
Senator Obama has indicated by his failure to acknowledge the success of the surge that he would rather loss a war then loss a campaign.
Which is a vacuous Rebitchlifuck blabbering point clipped from an entirely different part of the interview.
Couric took over as anchor of the CBS Evening News after Dan Rather left in disgrace over a story on George W. Bush’s horrifically dubious National Guard record. The story was accurate enough, but relied in part on documents of dubious authenticity. Turns out that CBS never tried to authenticate the documents, its public statements to the contrary notwithstanding. The right wing machine screamed bloody murder, calling the documents forgeries (never established) and demanding Rather’s head on a platter.
Surely our conservative brethren will give Couric the same treatment for this far more egregious breach of journalistic ethics, right?